Most recent edit on 2007-04-27 13:31:55 by GregEhmka
Additions:
See: Arguments, Why.
Deletions:
See: Arguments.
Oldest known version of this page was edited on 2006-05-14 16:13:26 by GregEhmka []
Page view:
Right and Wrong
All determinations of right and wrong are comparative in nature and therefore can only exist or be valid relative to a value or inside of a value system. To prove this, simply observe that in any “right and wrong” conversation there is a spoken or (more usually) unspoken larger context of value inside of which the right and wrong conversation is taking place. Since there is no absolute (greatest) value system, there cannot be an absolute (greatest) sense of right and wrong. Right and wrong are evaluations and interpretations measured against a given value system. Wrong is interpreted as some form of danger, threat or potential loss to the previously accepted values or vale system. Right is interpreted as some form of nurturing, sustenance or potential gain to the previously accepted values or value system.
See: Arguments.
